Tar Sand Oil: EU Alarmism on CO2 Pollution Fantasy Contradicts the EU’s Oil Trade Practices

Except for conscious folks who know all too well that the fabricated story about the so-called CO2 pollution is nothing but a corporate fantasy bubble, brainwashed man made climate change alarmists will once again have a hard time explaining yet another obvious piece of evidence that they indeed are fighting the wrong battle.

It has been pointed out countless times [1, 2, 3] already that the whole world is being held hostage in one of the biggest global frauds of all time, one that is on par with the intentionally triggered financial crash of 2007 [1, 2] which just like the climate change religion is generating billions of dollars and euros for a select few financiers like Bill Gates, for false prophets and criminal institutions like the EU and the UN.

It’s not that it is bad that the European Union is buying oil from Al Qaeda, a group of UNEI mercenaries that the EU labels as terrorists but also funds and supports. After all, the emission of CO2 is not poisonous for the environment although the business partners in this deal are questionable on both sides to say the least. In fact, it documents in a quite robust manner how fabricated and deceptive all the bold statements are when it comes to man made global warming and the war on terror.

While the obedient herd of man made climate change alarmists remain clueless how to explain or even defend the UN’s, the EU’s, the WWF’s and Greenpeace’s stances on several topics like Fukushima 3/11, chemtrails and Al Gore’s PFTBA in his fuel cells, why the UN operates in secret in relation to climate scandals or why several climategate cases [1, 2, 3] remain underreported, the misguided alarmists are once again faced with a daunting task.

While the EU proclaims to be fighting carbon emissions allegedly to protect the world from climate change, as it is stated on their own website (even though NASA and first-graders know better) the EU is once again entangled in practices that completely contradict what the EU actually pontificates. Given the fascist-communist nature of the European Union that is not really surprising but the EU and their loyal alarmists will still have to explain why the EU is allowing and even encouraging the import of and trade in tar sand oil.

Yesterday, June 9, RT.com reported on a major shipment of tar sand oil that had recently arrived at the Spanish port of Bilbao. The crude oil had been transported with UNICOM’s Aleksey Kosygin oil tanker. Tar sand oil, according to the EU’s own Fuel Quality Directive, has a “carbon footprint [that is] higher than the carbon footprint of conventional oil.” Tar sand oil has been classified by the EU as “25 percent more pollutive” than other forms of crude oil, according to RT. How can the EU in an honest and credible fashion clarify this conflicting situation without losing face and grace? Of course they won’t because the EU knows that most people hardly pay any attention.

UNICOM, who operates the oil tanker Aleksey Kosygin, the Cyprus Shipping Chamber and the EU work together intimately at least since the creation of the Technology Platform for Maritime and Marine Research Innovation and Training (PTMB). This alleged “technology platform” was launched for the purpose of defining and implementing the EU’s maritime “Blue Book” policies including for climate change. Thus, it is highly unlikely that the public will ever get any real and meaningful answers from either parties when it comes to tar sand oil trade and transportation because the PTMB is actually a private club even though the EU proclaims to be serving the public and even though the PTMB is publicly chaired by Italy’s minister of infrastructure and transport.

According to it’s website “the PTMB was officially launched in Rome on 18 May 2009 – as a side event around the European Maritime Day celebrations. … The role of the PTMB is aimed at establishing a common platform for dialogue between all relevant stakeholders from the Mediterranean and Black Seas … as well as at contributing to the appropriate allocation of necessary financial resources.”

Another participant in the PTMB is the Bulgarian Ship Hydrodynamics Centre, a NATO program partner.

Cyprus Shipping Chamber: “The aim of the Chambers … is to help steer discussions and develop projects that will benefit Cyprus Shipping and … the Chambers members.”

Just like several similar think thanks and conference platforms such as the Club of Rome, Bilderberg and the Trilateral Commission where the EU and dominant corporations are always represented so too is the PTMB a club for a select few where public opinion, including on climate change, is being steered and hatched and funds are being allocated from and to members of the select club.

It is exactly because of such think thanks and conference platforms, about which Jane and John Doe know nothing about, that the corporative global governance alliance has been able to get away unpunished with all their deception and fabricated realities that have already resulted in the successful implementation of CO2 taxes across the world. Taxes that in no way contribute to the protection of the environment at all. The sole purpose of these taxes is to line the pockets of those who have established the illegal tax schemes. It’s really as simple as that. The climate alarmists can’t possibly defend these facts because it would mean the end of their religion and the end of their false prophets’ reigns. The climate alarmists also can’t possibly debunk these facts because that’s why it are actual facts and not false gospels.

Advertisements

Chemtrails and Your Health: The Implications of Trimethyl Aluminum (TMA)

In response to our article “Innocent Photos of Chemtrailing over the Netherlands, May 2014,” several readers have sent us questions regarding the chemtrail phenomenon. All the answers to these questions can easily be found when readers actually click on the links that are embedded in the text of that article, such as:

However, should there still be more questions that remain unanswered then it may serve you well to read and view:

One particular question that was sent in has not yet properly been answered in the listed articles above. That question is about whether or not regular passenger airliners are being used for chemtrailing and if so how it is done.

The answer is actually quite simple. To the jet fuel of (commercial) airliners several chemicals are in many cases, if not all, added to improve the ignition of the fuel because at high altitudes flame-out occurs in the jet engines when no additives are added. To overcome this, chemicals such as trimethyl aluminum (TMA) are added to the jet fuel.

However, the use of trimethyl aluminum is not without danger or implications. This chemical is a serious hazard to the human health and the environment. This can be confirmed even with official documents and publications such as:

In the case of the New Jersey Department of Health they also state that “trimethyl aluminum has not been tested for its ability to cause cancer in animals.” About trimethyl aluminum’s ability to cause cancer in humans nothing specific is stated, thus suggesting that according to this department of health no tests have been conducted or the results of such tests have not been published yet. The document is a in 2000 revised publication of the 1986 original. the document contiues: “Trimethyl aluminum has not been tested for its ability to affect reproduction … trimethyl aluminum has not been tested for other chronic (long-term) health effects.”

The UCLA document states that trimethylaluminum (TMA) “decomposes into irritating dust that may cause liver and kidney damage … Residual dusts have been implicated in kidney and liver damage in laboratory animals.

Trimethyl aluminum is also used by NASA in jet stream studies:  Trimethyl aluminum “forms milky, white clouds that allow those on the ground to ‘see’ the winds in space and track them with cameras.”

Knowing very well that trimethyl aluminum poses a hazard to the human health and the environment, the use of this chemical for such studies is therefore irresponsible at best because there always is residual fallout from such experiments, as good as NASA’s intentions may possibly be.

Trimethyl aluminum, greenpeace

In addition to the impact on the environment and health, a matter that is constantly being censored even by Greenpeace who also completely ignores the whole chemtrail matter on purpose [2] which is no surprise at all because they also censor the truth about Fukushima, trimethyl aluminum is also a semiconductor, thus quite appropriate for amplification of signals, switching, and energy conversion. These qualities are very useful for global geo-engineering and for other more intense and local applications such as controlling, steering, and enhancing of hurricanes and weather systems; triggering of earthquakes and volcano eruptions to name only a few. These applications are not fiction, “owning the weather by 2025 (USAF)” and former US secretary of defense William S. Cohen already discussed and admitted this openly in the 1990s.

Real examples of such applications in practice are: “Frankenstorm” Sandy (USA), the 3/11 tsunami/earthquake (Japan), Mexico’s March 20, 2012, earthquake and typhoon Hayan/Yolanda (Philippines), among others.

Should anyone wonder if the WWF has something valuable to say about trimethyl aluminum, rest assured… they don’t! And just like the UN, the EU and Greenpeace the WWF censors the truth about Fukushima. Anything about chemtrails at the WWF? No, not a single word.

Trimethyl aluminum, wwf

So, as we have listed earlier in the provided links, CO2 emission caused by human activity is not the reason why the climate on Earth changes. When you still have doubts about it, read this too.

The reason why chemtrailing and other geo-engineering activities occur is purely for the military and multinational corporations to control the weather for warfare, power and profits. It’s really as simple as that. All the other reasons such as “to stop climate change” are pure garbage and are favorite narratives of the secretive United Nations.

Update 4: ISIL Suspect Arrested for Jewish Museum Shooting in Brussels, Belgium

The Belgian and French press are currently reporting that the alleged suspect of the May 24 shooting in the jewish museum in Brussels, Belgium, had been arrested on Friday May 30 after arriving in Marseilles, France, by buss coming from Brussels.

Government and media reports claim that the alleged 29-year-old shooter Mehdi Nemmouche, a French national, is a known mercenary who had previously fought in Syria against the Assad-regime in the ranks of the ISIL (Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant).

syria, isil, jewish museum, brussels, shooting, terror, lone shooter, israel lobby, belgium, europe, eu, elections, department of homeland security, israel, Mehdi Nemmouche

Of course, now that the alleged shooter is officially being linked to ISIL another embarrassing situation has come up for the Belgian, Israeli and US governments. From the very start the Belgian government and the EU were undeniably pressured by the Israel lobby to advertise the Brussels museum shooting as “antisemitic terrorism,” although no evidence existed then and not even today, to support such claims, as the western propaganda machine goes in overdrive.

The fact that Nemmouche is being linked to ISIL is embarrassing because the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant that is fighting against the Assad-regime is a by the western governments backed and sponsored terror group, linked to the CIA’s favorite … Al Qaeda.

Earlier, ISIL attacks on Israeli installations in the occupied Syrian Golan Heights were used as a pretext by Israel to justify air strikes on a Syrian airbase. Also the Turkish government has been caught working together with ISIL, to justify their invasion of Syria under the pretext of defending the tomb of Suleyman Shah.

ISIL is known to be a faction of Al Qaeda mercenaries that are being funded and supplied by Washington, Brussels, Ankara, London, Paris, Tel Aviv and Riyadh, in their efforts to overthrow the Syrian government in which they fortunately continue to fail [1, 2, 3]. Additional reports confirm that indeed ISIL has become an important instrument of the UNEI-Saudi alliance (US/NATO/EU/Israel) to further destabilize the Middle East, aside from the fact that members of this alliance are active in every country where there is the greatest risk for terrorism.”

A FNA (Iran) report of May 5, 2014, describes that the CIA, the Mossad, MI6 and arab allies have set up a joint operation room in Amman, Jordan, “to undermine the security and stability of Iran, Iraq, Syria and Egypt.” It also describes that the operations of the ISIL have been the products of this joint operation room.

Thus, all this information is quite embarrassing, to say the least, for those who have proudly reported that they have captured the alleged suspect of the Museum shooting in Brussels. After all, how can this man be involved in antisemitic terrorism when Israel is at least involved in his very hiring and deployment in Syria? Does the Israeli government then fund attacks on its own people, abroad and in Israel?

The UNEI alliance has created such an enormous monster, Al Qaeda and its terrorism, that all control over it has already been lost a long time ago. Loose cannons of the several factions that comprise Al Qaeda are now turning on their creators and when they do they are regarded as mere expendable assets. Whether ISIL and Al Qaeda attacks occur or are being staged in the Middle East, the US or Europe doesn’t really matter to the creators of the beast, anyway it turns out more security measures can and will be implemented. In the end, both ways serve the same imperialistic cause and hardly anyone of the general public seems to even care.

Body Count: UNEI’s 1.5 Million Deaths in the “War on Terror” Since 2001

The so-called “war on terror” that was launched in 2001 by the US, NATO, the EU and Israel (UNEI) is in fact, simply put, a war on everyone who refuses to submit to the alliance’s dominance and imperialism. This war has little to do with terrorists as it is defined by the UNEI alliance because it is a fact that under their own definition of ‘terrorism’ they themselves are the biggest terrorist organization that the world has ever seen. Their terrorism has claimed more lives than any extremist since world war 2 and most of those deaths are innocent citizens that the UNEI alliance calls ‘collateral damage.’ It comes with the job and territory, according to UNEI.

To no surprise of course, the available data on the real death toll since the launch of the “war on terror” – since the official declaration of war on the truth and reality – is heavily distorted and in many cases that data is not made available at all to the public on purpose by those who benefit the most from withholding information and fabricated casualty numbers. This is being done to deceive the public opinion, both nationally and abroad, to allow the continuation of the UNEI’s propaganda and deceptive global regime.

Lets have a look on how many people have died already at the hands of the UNEI alliance and due to their conquest of the world.

The listed death counts for every country and for every year are to be perceived as very conservative estimates only because the available data is scarce.

 

USA: 4,000+ Deaths on 9/11 and in the Aftermath

According to some sources the number of 9/11 health-related deaths may however be much higher and may be more than 10,000. Official sources will of course deny this as they continue to parrot the false narratives [1].

 

Iraq: 713,000+ to 1,000,000+ Deaths Since and Due to the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq by the US-led Alliance

  • 650,000+ deaths (between 2003 and 2006) [1, 2, 3]
  • 30,000+ deaths (between 2006 and 2007) [1]
  • 7,000+ deaths (in 2008) [1]
  • 5,000+ deaths (in 2009) [1]
  • 4,000+ deaths (in 2010) [1]
  • 4,000+ deaths (in 2011) [1]

“The US Departure from Iraq is an Illusion”

Although the US-led alliance officially pulled out of Iraq in 2011, 17,000+ personnel remain(ed) in Iraq.

  • 4,500+ deaths (in 2012) [1]
  • 8,500+ deaths (in 2013) [1]

 

Afghanistan: 33,000+ to 100,000+ Deaths Since and Due to the 2001 US-led Invasion and War

  • 33,000+ deaths (between 2001 and 2011) [1, 2]

 

Pakistan: 52,000+ to 100,000+ Deaths Since and Due to US-led Military Interventions

  • 52,000+ deaths (between 2001-2003 and 2013) [1, 2]

 

Yemen: 4,000+ to 10,000+ Deaths Since and Due to US-led Military Interventions and Destabilization

  • 2,000+ deaths (between 2002 and 2013) [1, 2]
  • 2,000+ deaths (between 2011 and 2012) [1]

 

Somalia: 2,000+ to 5,000+ Deaths Since and Due to US-led Military Interventions

  • 2,000+ deaths (between 2002 and 2013) [1]

 

Libya: 30,000+ to 100,000+ Deaths Since and Due to US/NATO-led Invasion

  • 30,000+ deaths (in 2011) [1]
  • 100,000+ deaths (in 2011) [1]

 

Syria: 160,000+ Deaths Since and Due to US-led Invasion and Military Interventions

  • 160,000+ (deaths since 2011) [1]

 

Egypt: 1,700+ to 3,000+ Deaths Since and Due to US-led Destabilization

  • 900+ to 1,700+ (in 2011) [1, 2]

 

Palestine: 8,000+ to 15,000+ Deaths Since UNEI War on Terror

  • 8,000+ (between 2001 and 2014) [1]

 

TOTAL: 1,497,000+ Deaths (using maximum, conservative, average estimated numbers)

 

Thus, a very conservative estimate provides us with a number of nearly 1.5 million people who have died since 2001, since the infamous new world order – a term proudly used by several politicians and governments – decided to officially take over the world, under the false pretext of “war on terror.” This is hardly an exaggeration because it is documented that the US alone is unfolding an agenda of taking over the African continent by deploying their troops in 35 African nations [1, 2], aside from the numerous other foreign nations – like France, the UK and Belgium – that are stationed in Africa. NATO too is increasingly pushing to be involved in African “peace missions.” As for the UN, we already know how peaceful their troops are, we already know that according to the UN their acts and crimes like pedophilia, human trafficking and forced prostitution are to be considered acts of humanitarianism.

It is appropriate to assume that the actual death toll is more than double, highly likely to be well over 3 million deaths of which most are innocent citizens who never were involved in any military activity, except to be regarded as collateral damage.

The false reasons constantly being given for military interventions in foreign nations by the UNEI alliance are always the same: to bring democracy, for regime change, to fight terror and for peace building. Who with their hearts in the right place can actually still believe that the UNEI is not a gang of thugs?

Imagine what would happen when China or Russia invades the US or the EU to bring regime change and real democracy, all hell would break loose in a matter of days. Yet when the UNEI does this, anywhere in the world, the press calls it humanitarian missions. “Hypocrisy” hardly describes it…

In conclusion, but equally important as the number of people that have already died in the fabled war on terror, we must also point out, again, how exactly the UNEI alliance tries to justify their war. They do this predominantly by staging terrorist attacks themselves that they then blame on muslim extremists or any other useful patsies that comes along, even the climate and natural forces are blamed for causing terrorism. In the article “17 Signature ‘Terrorist’ Attacks on the 11th Day” a brief summary is provided of attacks that have been staged or initiated by the UNEI alliance. Among others, these attacks include 9/11 (USA, 2001), 3/11 (Spain, 2004), 7/7 (UK, 2005), 12/11 (Sweden, 2010) and 3/11 (Japan, 2011). In “The Financial ‘Crisis’ and the September 11 Signature… in 2007 and 2008” the same pattern is described, albeit in relation to financial terrorism, that can also be directly linked to the UNEI alliance.

Update 3 Museum Shooting Brussels: Tel Aviv Couple Worked for Israeli Department of Homeland Security

jewish museum, brussels, shooting, terror, lone shooter, israel lobby, belgium, europe, eu, elections, department of homeland security, israel

Jewish sources have confirmed that both Emanuel Riva and Miriam Riva, the Tel Aviv couple that was murdered in the Brussels jewish museum on May 24, worked for the Israeli government. The Sources explicitly state that the Riva’s worked for “Ministry of Public Security” / “DHS” which stands for the Israeli Department of Homeland Security. They were able to conclude this because they had seen the by the Israeli government submitted obituary in a newspaper that announced the deaths of Emanuel Riva and Miriam Riva, as can be seen in the above image which is a copy of that particular obituary.

The sources further describe that Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been wrongfully using the shooting in Brussels on purpose to further the “antisemitic” agenda, which we explained partially in our previous updates [1, 2] about this shooting. Continuously the Israeli government and the Israel lobby capitalize on any incident that involves jewish people, in an endless attempt to further portray Israel as the black sheep of the world, the “powerless” victim that everyone hates for no reason at all.

The jewish sources state it quite clear that they are tired of this propaganda and attitude of the Israeli government and the Knesset. They are tired of Netanyahu and his gang constantly holding the world hostage every time they see a chance. Thus, apparently and luckily we are not the only ones who are of this opinion. It sure puts the whole museum shooting in a different perspective to know that even some jewish communities are fed up with it and that they see through the “game of shadows,” as they describe it themselves.

It is also being reported that Miriam (Mira) Riva is a relative of a very influential Breslov Hasidim, rabbi Moshe Tsanany. Emanuel was reportedly working at the witness protection program of the Israeli government. The Riva’s funeral took place in Tel Aviv on May 27.

jewish museum, brussels, shooting, terror, lone shooter, israel lobby, belgium, europe, eu, elections, department of homeland security, israel
Emanuel Riva (right) with his twin brother Aryeh Riva at the bar mitzvah of Aryeh’s son.

The sources also point to the fact that a 72-year-old worker of the museum was absent due to illness and was replaced by a volunteer, although they do not seem to indicate that there’s any suspicion to be worried about concerning the 72-year-old.

Continuing in their report the jewish  sources draw attention to how Netanyahu, head rabbis, the pope, the mainstream press and the government all band together as they collectively brand the shooting as antisemitic, knowing very well that there’s no evidence to support such claims. Indeed, should it be reported and confirmed in the coming months by the establishment press or governments that they have been reporting wrong narratives at this time on the shooting, with some luck a correction in a footnote will be printed on the last page of a newspaper to rectify the earlier mistakes. Obviously too late by then and even now already because the whole world has been fooled into believing that Israel and all jews are yet again a victim of extremist muslims who are heinous terrorists. By then no one will ever care about the footnote and Netanyahu and the Israeli government got what they wanted anyway.

This is exactly how the whole “war on terror” works. Fabricate stories, play innocent yourself and make the people believe that they need more security measures from their government. It’s not a coincidence that Israel is the prime developer and exporter of police state techniques, policies and systems. Certainly the EU is eagerly buying into all of this, including the fake narrative of the museum shooting. If not due to pressure from the Israel lobby then certainly to expand their fascist federation.

Update 2: Shooting at Jewish Museum Brussels, Belgium

As the official stories surrounding the May 24 shooting at the Brussels Jewish museum in Belgium further unfold we can confirm that our initial starting points and assumptions are further being proven to be accurate.

First of all, the “antisemitic terrorism” narrative that was first established by the government, the press and the Israel lobby in Belgium is now being pushed into the fast lane and being parroted worldwide, clearly indicating that that was exactly the intention from the very start even though NO evidence existed upon which these claims could be based within the first few hours after the shooting. We saw the very same happening MINUTES after 9/11 happened in 2001. It was also then immediately claimed that muslim extremists were responsible for the attacks and completely out of nowhere the name Osama bin Laden was launched by amateur observers who could not have known that bin Laden would be the patsy, unless that person who mentioned that name when he did knew about the very plot that was masterminded and then unfolding, which would be very odd at least because the official narrative was that the attacks came out of nowhere – totally unexpected. Yeah, right! Then why were the war games of 9/11 used as a cover?

jewish museum, brussels, shooting, terror, lone shooter, israel lobby, belgium, europe, eu, elections

Two of the alleged victims of the museum shooting, Miriam and Emmanuel Riva (above), the Tel Aviv couple, worked as accountants in Israeli government services including the Finance Ministry. Emmanuel Riva, had previously worked for Nativ, “the Israeli government agency that played a covert role in fostering Jewish immigration from the former Soviet Union.” It is being claimed that Miriam Riva worked for the Mossad although her actual position in the intelligence agency remains unclear so far [2].

“It was just two years ago that they returned from Germany after an assignment in Berlin, where they worked as accountants at a government corporation,” write Times of Israel and Ynet. “It took authorities many hours to identify the couple because they were not carrying identification on them during the attack,” according to Times of Israel. She had previously also worked for the Israeli prime minister’s office.

Either way, the Israeli intelligence agencies can benefit from domestic and overseas workers, even if the workers themselves don’t know or don’t realize it, since they can easily obtain access to all information of any government department and service. The fact that at some point in time they were working on an assignment in Berlin for a government corporation further indicates that indeed the couple may have had compartmentalized links to Nativ and Mossad. Front corporations are hallmarks of intelligence agencies like the Mossad and the CIA.

“The phrase ‘government service’ in Hebrew can sometimes be a euphemism for spy work.  In her case [Miriam Riva], the phrase fits, but only in the sense that she most likely worked for Israel’s overseas spy service in a capacity,” writes Richard Silverstein.

Other indications that suggest that we indeed should further investigate extensively the alleged links to Nativ and the Mossad is a statement of Robert Ayers, former U.S. intelligence officer according to Yahoo: “I don’t think a professional hitman would have done it this way. It was a guy who was deranged, who had been planning on doing something like this and did it.” Why should we dismiss this possibility so easily? After all, only very few details on the alleged shooter have come out yet in the public domain. Why not further investigate this possible lead as well? 3/11 was also perpetrated in broad daylight! The strong push of the official narrative that brands this claimed shooting as “antisemitic terrorism” ever since the very first hours after the event, without evidence, also indicates that something else is being played out. That an underlying agenda is being furthered. isn’t it BUSH? … and NETANYAHU, who’s statements are perfect proof of that. He condemns the European politicians for not denouncing loudly enough the alleged “antisemitic” attack and therefore calls them hypocrites, even though the televised political debates had been canceled because of the shooting and because of pressure from the Israel lobby. Arrogant warmonger!

We have already mentioned this in our first report that from the very start, the very first public statements, the antisemitic card was being drawn. Immediately after the first media reports of the shooting, the Israel lobby in Belgium urged the Belgian government and the EU to fight antisemitism more intense because they blame the lack of strong measures in the EU against anti-Israel sentiment (which is automatically being branded as anti-jewish sentiment) as one of the very reasons why the shooting happened.

However, the “antisemitic terrorism” campaign that now surrounds the shooting hardly has any basis, if any at all, when it comes to the “attack on the jews and Israel” narrative. The Belgian jewish community leader Maurice Sosnowski stated that “the museum was not protected like other jewish centers in Brussels because it is not exclusively a jewish community structure,” writes Times of Israel. Therefore it is at least very irresponsible and misleading to call the shooting antisemitic. Because when we follow the same logic here, how would it be branded then when a killer walks in a gasoline station and shoots four people? Would this then be perceived as an attack on all car and motorbike owners, on all car manufacturers?

It is obvious that the world has been caught up again in a false campaign that profiles Israel as a powerless victim, we can see this from the first reactions from persons like Netanyahu, and Rolf Tophoven. According to Netanyahu the shooting is an attack on Israel, although it occurred in Belgium, while Tophoven describes the shooting as “a leaderless jihad” by people who “radicalize themselves on the Internet. It would be the story of the autonomous terrorist whom nobody had on their radar screens, whom nobody knew.” Striking how this description fits the deceptive “war on terror” propaganda and agenda of Israel, the US and EU governments and NATO. Isn’t it?

Just to be sure, read the US Global Anti-Semitism Review/Awareness Act, signed by Bush in 2004, and this State Department report. It has ISRAEL LOBBY and ‘anti-muslim’ written all over it. The Global Anti-Semitism Review/Awareness Act allows the US government to “document and combat acts of anti-Semitism globally,” it can be applied anywhere in the world on its own and even more extensively when combined with the US NDAA and the US Patriot Act. Literally anything goes in the false “war on terror.”

It is being claimed that the Global Anti-Semitism Review/Awareness Act only mandated a one-time report on anti-Semitic acts and that it has no further impact and that it grants the US government no additional powers. This is, however, not true. “The Act also established within the U.S. Department of State an Office of the Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism. On May 22, 2006, Gregg Rickman was sworn in by U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice as the first Special Envoy.” The current special envoy to monitor and combat anti-semitism is Ira Forman, former jewish outreach director for the “Obama for America” campaign. The shooting in Belgium is currently not on Forman’s public news feed so the Israel lobby will have to push the “antisemitic terrorism” narrative harder should they want to see it appear there.

In the US Department of State’s Contemporary Global Anti-Semitism report it is also stated that:

“Anti-Semitism is at the root of numerous contemporary conspiracy theories, including the following examples of false claims.

  • Four thousand jews were falsely accused of not reporting to work at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, supposedly because they had been warned not to do so by those who had advance knowledge of the attack.”

This alleged conspiracy theory, about 9/11, is based on a statement made by Syrian ambassador Turki Muhammad Saqr who reportedly said on October 24, 2001, that “Syria has documented proof of the Zionist regime’s involvement in the September 11 terror attacks on the United States … [That] 4,000 jews employed at the World Trade Center did not show up for work before the attack clearly attests to Zionist involvement in these attacks.” Even if Saqr’s claim is not correct it has on the other hand still to be explained why Odigo users and staff knew about the 9/11 attacks TWO HOURS in advance. Odigo, an Israeli start-up founded in 1998, was an instant messaging service provider in the US and Israel. Workers and clients of Odigo had received early warnings that were accurate to the minute, on the day of the attacks [1, 2]. Odigo was later, in 2002, acquired by another major Israeli company Comverse. Comverse was together with NICE caught in 2003 when it came out that they had been wiretapping the EU’s Justus Lipsius building in Brussels since the 1990s [1, 2].

Unfortunately for the Israel lobby, even the US State Department is not backing them up for a full 100%. The US State Department’s working definition of antisemitism includes a provision that says “criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as anti-Semitic.” So under this provision it is perfectly acceptable to repeat, for example, that Israel is involved in the eco-terror and war crimes committed on March 11, 2011, in Japan, because Israel too accuses other nations of similar crimes.

Currently there are also alternative theories circulating on what happened in Brussels, in the jewish museum. One such theory is that it was a false flag event to be blamed on Russia. This shooting, according to this theory, can then be used as a pretext to legitimately attack Russia as a punishment for its invasion of Ukraine. That this shooting is part of a false flag campaign is certainly possible yes, we do not exclude that but further investigation and more leads are needed to confirm or disprove this.

The linked theory also points to an initial photo of the crime scene where it is claimed, by the author of that theory, that the photo is suspicious. There’s not enough blood and the clothes of the victims show no bloodstains, according to that author.

jewish museum, brussels, shooting, terror, lone shooter, israel lobby, belgium, europe, eu, elections

jewish museum, brussels, shooting, terror, lone shooter, israel lobby, belgium, europe, eu, elections

Sure it is possible that the shooting is staged but what proof is there for such claims? On what current fact can such claims be based? Belgium is not Hollywood, by far, and based on the provided videos the shooter was a hitman, not a rookie. The mentioned theory, originating from The Netherlands, is nothing more than that: a theory. Completely baseless and full of unfounded claims. No evidence is provided in any way. The video images are generally of poor quality and there where quality is better the shooter is completely unidentifiable. Purposely have the useful parts been cut out of course.

The fact is that should the government and the press in Belgium have described the shooting as a murder case and not immediately have given in to the Israel lobby’s deceptive “antisemitic terrorism” narrative this case would have quickly disappeared from the frontpages around the world. It would hardly be noticed at all.

But no, “lets call it a terrorist attack” then we can deploy more resources, stuff the streets with cops and search everyone, because who knows maybe the terrorist is hiding in a bag or a stroller. “Watch out” maybe there’s a bomb in there too.. Yeah, lets rape the public their rights with terror narratives!

jewish museum, brussels, shooting, terror, lone shooter, israel lobby, belgium, europe, eu, elections

It’s exactly what the whole “antisemitic terror” campaign was intended to do and it is working well for those who have been scripting it in the last couple of days. The Belgian OCAD unit has already announced that all police headquarters in the country and even the army are on high alert now because “the terrorist may strike there too.” It’s completely absurd and a totally exaggerated dramatized spectacle by now. Reality has been lost in the last few days and it seems very unlikely that it will ever return. Thank the gods for the “war on terror” and thank the gods for the peaceful state of Israel! Life on Earth would be horribly dull without those two.

Update: Brussels Shooting at Jewish Museum

Yesterday we reported on the shooting that occurred in a jewish museum in Brussels, Belgium, on Saturday. We described how, under strong pressure from the Israel lobby, the Belgian government and media had already concluded that the shooting was an act of “antisemitic terrorism,” although no evidence existed that could substantiate such claims.

During the elections in Belgium and the EU, Sunday May 25, police investigators released CCTV footage and photos from inside the museum and from its entrance wherein the shooter can be seen. Because the police investigators are stuck in the investigation and can’t identify the shooter they have requested the public for tips and help.

The video footage and photos were released the next day, after the shooting had occurred. The video quality does not allow to identify the alleged shooter. Yet, within hours after the shooting on Saturday the government, the Israel lobby and the media had already established the narrative and had already shaped the public opinion by claiming that the attack was an act of terrorism aimed at the jewish community and Israel. Haaretz even went as far as to claim that it was almost certain that it involved Muslim extremists, even though no images or video footage was yet released. A full day before the eventual videos and photos were provided to the public by the Belgian police was it already concluded by the Israel lobby and several other government sources, and eventually the press, that the attack looked very similar to Al Qaeda’s MO. Founded on wild assumption without any evidence to back up these claims.

The available videos and images provide no credible indications that indeed the alleged shooter is a Muslim or a member of Al CIAda:

Video link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgNLryxEB7U

Today, May 26, we read DailyMail’s updated version of their article on the shooting in Brussels wherein it is now being claimed that “authorities strongly suspect Al Qaeda-linked Islamic radicals are behind the attack.” No source for such claims is provided nor any evidence to back it up. Although it is widely known that DailyMail is a trashy tabloid piece, millions of people do read it every day so the article certainly has a lot of influence on public opinion and is by many perceived as the official narrative.

The victims are claimed to be Emanuel Riva and Miriam Riva from Tel Aviv, Dominique Chabrier and Alexandre Strens.

[update May 27, 2014: The Riva’s two children, daughters, are Shira and Ayelet – age 17 and 15 or 16 and 15 (1, 2). The Riva’s funeral took place at the Kiryat Shaul cemetery in Tel Aviv.]