As the official stories surrounding the May 24 shooting at the Brussels Jewish museum in Belgium further unfold we can confirm that our initial starting points and assumptions are further being proven to be accurate.
First of all, the “antisemitic terrorism” narrative that was first established by the government, the press and the Israel lobby in Belgium is now being pushed into the fast lane and being parroted worldwide, clearly indicating that that was exactly the intention from the very start even though NO evidence existed upon which these claims could be based within the first few hours after the shooting. We saw the very same happening MINUTES after 9/11 happened in 2001. It was also then immediately claimed that muslim extremists were responsible for the attacks and completely out of nowhere the name Osama bin Laden was launched by amateur observers who could not have known that bin Laden would be the patsy, unless that person who mentioned that name when he did knew about the very plot that was masterminded and then unfolding, which would be very odd at least because the official narrative was that the attacks came out of nowhere – totally unexpected. Yeah, right! Then why were the war games of 9/11 used as a cover?
Two of the alleged victims of the museum shooting, Miriam and Emmanuel Riva (above), the Tel Aviv couple, worked as accountants in Israeli government services including the Finance Ministry. Emmanuel Riva, had previously worked for Nativ, “the Israeli government agency that played a covert role in fostering Jewish immigration from the former Soviet Union.” It is being claimed that Miriam Riva worked for the Mossad although her actual position in the intelligence agency remains unclear so far .
“It was just two years ago that they returned from Germany after an assignment in Berlin, where they worked as accountants at a government corporation,” write Times of Israel and Ynet. “It took authorities many hours to identify the couple because they were not carrying identification on them during the attack,” according to Times of Israel. She had previously also worked for the Israeli prime minister’s office.
Either way, the Israeli intelligence agencies can benefit from domestic and overseas workers, even if the workers themselves don’t know or don’t realize it, since they can easily obtain access to all information of any government department and service. The fact that at some point in time they were working on an assignment in Berlin for a government corporation further indicates that indeed the couple may have had compartmentalized links to Nativ and Mossad. Front corporations are hallmarks of intelligence agencies like the Mossad and the CIA.
“The phrase ‘government service’ in Hebrew can sometimes be a euphemism for spy work. In her case [Miriam Riva], the phrase fits, but only in the sense that she most likely worked for Israel’s overseas spy service in a capacity,” writes Richard Silverstein.
Other indications that suggest that we indeed should further investigate extensively the alleged links to Nativ and the Mossad is a statement of Robert Ayers, former U.S. intelligence officer according to Yahoo: “I don’t think a professional hitman would have done it this way. It was a guy who was deranged, who had been planning on doing something like this and did it.” Why should we dismiss this possibility so easily? After all, only very few details on the alleged shooter have come out yet in the public domain. Why not further investigate this possible lead as well? 3/11 was also perpetrated in broad daylight! The strong push of the official narrative that brands this claimed shooting as “antisemitic terrorism” ever since the very first hours after the event, without evidence, also indicates that something else is being played out. That an underlying agenda is being furthered. isn’t it BUSH? … and NETANYAHU, who’s statements are perfect proof of that. He condemns the European politicians for not denouncing loudly enough the alleged “antisemitic” attack and therefore calls them hypocrites, even though the televised political debates had been canceled because of the shooting and because of pressure from the Israel lobby. Arrogant warmonger!
We have already mentioned this in our first report that from the very start, the very first public statements, the antisemitic card was being drawn. Immediately after the first media reports of the shooting, the Israel lobby in Belgium urged the Belgian government and the EU to fight antisemitism more intense because they blame the lack of strong measures in the EU against anti-Israel sentiment (which is automatically being branded as anti-jewish sentiment) as one of the very reasons why the shooting happened.
However, the “antisemitic terrorism” campaign that now surrounds the shooting hardly has any basis, if any at all, when it comes to the “attack on the jews and Israel” narrative. The Belgian jewish community leader Maurice Sosnowski stated that “the museum was not protected like other jewish centers in Brussels because it is not exclusively a jewish community structure,” writes Times of Israel. Therefore it is at least very irresponsible and misleading to call the shooting antisemitic. Because when we follow the same logic here, how would it be branded then when a killer walks in a gasoline station and shoots four people? Would this then be perceived as an attack on all car and motorbike owners, on all car manufacturers?
It is obvious that the world has been caught up again in a false campaign that profiles Israel as a powerless victim, we can see this from the first reactions from persons like Netanyahu, and Rolf Tophoven. According to Netanyahu the shooting is an attack on Israel, although it occurred in Belgium, while Tophoven describes the shooting as “a leaderless jihad” by people who “radicalize themselves on the Internet. It would be the story of the autonomous terrorist whom nobody had on their radar screens, whom nobody knew.” Striking how this description fits the deceptive “war on terror” propaganda and agenda of Israel, the US and EU governments and NATO. Isn’t it?
Just to be sure, read the US Global Anti-Semitism Review/Awareness Act, signed by Bush in 2004, and this State Department report. It has ISRAEL LOBBY and ‘anti-muslim’ written all over it. The Global Anti-Semitism Review/Awareness Act allows the US government to “document and combat acts of anti-Semitism globally,” it can be applied anywhere in the world on its own and even more extensively when combined with the US NDAA and the US Patriot Act. Literally anything goes in the false “war on terror.”
It is being claimed that the Global Anti-Semitism Review/Awareness Act only mandated a one-time report on anti-Semitic acts and that it has no further impact and that it grants the US government no additional powers. This is, however, not true. “The Act also established within the U.S. Department of State an Office of the Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism. On May 22, 2006, Gregg Rickman was sworn in by U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice as the first Special Envoy.” The current special envoy to monitor and combat anti-semitism is Ira Forman, former jewish outreach director for the “Obama for America” campaign. The shooting in Belgium is currently not on Forman’s public news feed so the Israel lobby will have to push the “antisemitic terrorism” narrative harder should they want to see it appear there.
In the US Department of State’s Contemporary Global Anti-Semitism report it is also stated that:
“Anti-Semitism is at the root of numerous contemporary conspiracy theories, including the following examples of false claims.
- Four thousand jews were falsely accused of not reporting to work at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, supposedly because they had been warned not to do so by those who had advance knowledge of the attack.”
This alleged conspiracy theory, about 9/11, is based on a statement made by Syrian ambassador Turki Muhammad Saqr who reportedly said on October 24, 2001, that “Syria has documented proof of the Zionist regime’s involvement in the September 11 terror attacks on the United States … [That] 4,000 jews employed at the World Trade Center did not show up for work before the attack clearly attests to Zionist involvement in these attacks.” Even if Saqr’s claim is not correct it has on the other hand still to be explained why Odigo users and staff knew about the 9/11 attacks TWO HOURS in advance. Odigo, an Israeli start-up founded in 1998, was an instant messaging service provider in the US and Israel. Workers and clients of Odigo had received early warnings that were accurate to the minute, on the day of the attacks [1, 2]. Odigo was later, in 2002, acquired by another major Israeli company Comverse. Comverse was together with NICE caught in 2003 when it came out that they had been wiretapping the EU’s Justus Lipsius building in Brussels since the 1990s [1, 2].
Unfortunately for the Israel lobby, even the US State Department is not backing them up for a full 100%. The US State Department’s working definition of antisemitism includes a provision that says “criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as anti-Semitic.” So under this provision it is perfectly acceptable to repeat, for example, that Israel is involved in the eco-terror and war crimes committed on March 11, 2011, in Japan, because Israel too accuses other nations of similar crimes.
Currently there are also alternative theories circulating on what happened in Brussels, in the jewish museum. One such theory is that it was a false flag event to be blamed on Russia. This shooting, according to this theory, can then be used as a pretext to legitimately attack Russia as a punishment for its invasion of Ukraine. That this shooting is part of a false flag campaign is certainly possible yes, we do not exclude that but further investigation and more leads are needed to confirm or disprove this.
The linked theory also points to an initial photo of the crime scene where it is claimed, by the author of that theory, that the photo is suspicious. There’s not enough blood and the clothes of the victims show no bloodstains, according to that author.
Sure it is possible that the shooting is staged but what proof is there for such claims? On what current fact can such claims be based? Belgium is not Hollywood, by far, and based on the provided videos the shooter was a hitman, not a rookie. The mentioned theory, originating from The Netherlands, is nothing more than that: a theory. Completely baseless and full of unfounded claims. No evidence is provided in any way. The video images are generally of poor quality and there where quality is better the shooter is completely unidentifiable. Purposely have the useful parts been cut out of course.
The fact is that should the government and the press in Belgium have described the shooting as a murder case and not immediately have given in to the Israel lobby’s deceptive “antisemitic terrorism” narrative this case would have quickly disappeared from the frontpages around the world. It would hardly be noticed at all.
But no, “lets call it a terrorist attack” then we can deploy more resources, stuff the streets with cops and search everyone, because who knows maybe the terrorist is hiding in a bag or a stroller. “Watch out” maybe there’s a bomb in there too.. Yeah, lets rape the public their rights with terror narratives!
It’s exactly what the whole “antisemitic terror” campaign was intended to do and it is working well for those who have been scripting it in the last couple of days. The Belgian OCAD unit has already announced that all police headquarters in the country and even the army are on high alert now because “the terrorist may strike there too.” It’s completely absurd and a totally exaggerated dramatized spectacle by now. Reality has been lost in the last few days and it seems very unlikely that it will ever return. Thank the gods for the “war on terror” and thank the gods for the peaceful state of Israel! Life on Earth would be horribly dull without those two.